Privates :) und Spiel » unfortunate that some people are going out of

The BCCI remains hopeful Indias Supreme Court will take a considered decision on the Lodha Committees latest proposal to disqualify all office bearers in the board and state associations if they fail to fulfill the eligibility criteria. A few of the BCCIs top office bearers and officials said the board will not change its stance, but was happy to sit with the committee and have a dialogue to find a solution to the long-standing feud.The latest suggestions were a part of the committees third status report, which was submitted in the court on November 18. The committee has told the court that despite clear timelines in place to implement the recommendations that were approved by the court in its July 18 judgement, neither the BCCI nor the state associations have obeyed the order, and have continued to be negligent.One reason for the BCCIs optimism was because the court had earlier refrained from approving a proposal of the committee to supersede the top brass of the board.In an order on October 21, the court noted that although it had found substance in the status report, it said at this stage it was refraining from approving the committees suggestion to supersede the office bearers because the board had said in a submission to the court that it would make every genuine effort to persuade the state associations to comply with the recommendations.The BCCI maintains it has done so in the interim. The committee wants us to implement all the recommendations in toto or wants all the office bearers to go, a senior board office bearer said. But no one understands that the BCCI has already accepted nearly 75% of the recommendations, most of those being already put into practice.The board, however, has consistently opposed certain key reforms such as the age cap of 70 years for board officials, the tenure cap of nine years with cooling-off periods in between, and the one-state-one-vote policy, among others.Thakur and Shirke had been asked to submit written undertakings to the court stating the board would unequivocally implement the order of October 21, and then meet with the Lodha Committee. The October 21 order had limited the financial freedom of the BCCI and had also directed the board not to disburse any funds to state associations until they complied unreservedly with the recommendations.In their affidavits, both Thakur and Shirke pointed out that board members had voted against adopting all the recommendations of the committee at the BCCI special general meeting on October 1. It is understood that committee did not feel it necessary to meet the BCCIs top office bearers after that, considering they had already stated the board would not comply with the court order.However the BCCIs reading of the situation is different. To ensure that cricket runs smoothly, the court had asked the committee to appoint an auditor as soon as possible, the office bearer said. No auditor has been appointed so far. The committee was also asked to set a threshold limit for various financial transactions the BCCI gets into. No threshold limit has been given. All our major decisions have been put on hold.The BCCI also questioned why the committee had proposed retired bureaucrat and former home secretary GK Pillai as an observer to look after the governance of the board. The committee suggested Pillai could also approve the various contractual obligations of the board in the future.On the one hand the committee says there should not be any government officials [working as an office bearer or official]. On what basis did they then pick GK Pillai? Was there a process? the office bearer said. Incidentally the committee has never imposed any restrictions on former civil servants, which Pillai is.A top BCCI official said that an adverse court decision against the board was not likely to affect the ongoing Test series between India and England. Already the court has approved expenses for those Test matches till December 5. For the remaining matches, we will have to wait and see what the court says, the official said. Nike Air Max 95 Herr Rea .C. -- Calgarys Kevin Koe did it the hard way again. Nike Air Max 98 Sverige . All of the scoring came in the final 20:04. Lucic scored on a power play at 15:46 of the third period, when he tipped a shot over Stars goalie Kari Lehtonen for a 3-1 lead. http://www.reaairmaxsverige.com/air-max-720-rabatt.html . -- Nate Robinson has played for seven teams, so beating one of them is no longer a rare occurrence. Nike Air Max 97 Rea . Brett Kulak and Jackson Houck of the Vancouver Giants were each charged with assault causing bodily harm on Aug. 18, according to the B.C. court services. Air Max 270 React Sverige . The team said Saturday that Lopez was hurt during its 121-120 overtime loss at Philadelphia on Friday. The Nets said they would issue another update next week after consultation with their doctors. Do the right thing.Kangaroos utility Michael Morgan says the simple motto is the only safeguard for concerned NRL players after an increase in illegally obtained footage being shopped around to the media.The Rugby League Players Association has taken a hardline stance on the issue, saying they will support legal action from NRL players who believe their privacy has been abused or if theyve been subject to an extortion attempt.Last week footage of Parramatta star Corey Norman and an unnamed Brisbane player was offered to networks for a large sum but was turned down.Queensland State of Origin star Morgan admitted the trend was a worry but believed the onus was still on players to behave themselves.It is unfortunate that some people are going out of their way nearly to make money out of it - its frustrating and annoying, Morgan said.But we are in control of that, no one else is.It does come back to us.Sydney Roosters coach Trent Robbinson on Sunday called on the NRL and RLPA to do more to protect the rights of players.ddddddddddddHis call came after Mitchell Pearce was suspended earlier this year after footage of the drunken Roosters halfback was obtained at a private party without his permission and aired without his consent.North Queensland pivot Morgan admitted sometimes it did not take much for situations with the public to get out of hand but was convinced good decisions by players would avoid any future controversy.I have been out and you see how things can go wrong, he said.But we have a very good group up here (North Queensland).We are pretty well behaved and pretty switched on, know when is the right time to do some things and not others.Its all about the position you are in and the only person in control of that is us. ' ' '